Phase 5 — Collaboration & Review
Status: Not started — Target: Weeks 31–38
Objective
Recruit expert reviewers from three fields for adversarial review of the complete manuscript. Revise based on their feedback.
Reviewer 1: Mechanistic Interpretability Researcher
Ideal profile: A researcher at Anthropic, EleutherAI, DeepMind, or an academic lab engaged in serious interpretability work.
Role: Verify that all computational claims are technically accurate, that proposed experiments are feasible, and that results are correctly interpreted. Identify existing interpretability findings relevant to the project but not yet recognized as such.
Reviewer:
Their assessment:
Weakest claim identified:
Strongest objection from their field:
Technical errors found:
Reviewer 2: Lacanian Theorist
Ideal profile: A scholar in the tradition of Milner, Fink, or Soler — someone at a psychoanalytic institute with serious theoretical commitments who can assess fidelity to the texts.
Role: Assess whether the formal extraction of Lacanian properties in Phase 1 is faithful to the texts and whether the theoretical arguments are philosophically sound. Identify where the project oversimplifies or distorts Lacan.
Reviewer:
Their assessment:
Weakest claim identified:
Strongest objection from their field:
Textual errors or distortions found:
Reviewer 3: Philosopher of Mind
Ideal profile: Someone familiar with both the multiple realizability literature and continental philosophy of technology, who can engage both analytic and continental traditions.
Role: Vet the ontological claims — the move from structural similarity to process identity, and the argument that lack is a property of symbolic systems rather than subjects.
Reviewer:
Their assessment:
Weakest claim identified:
Strongest objection from their field:
Philosophical errors found:
Revision Log
| Date | Reviewer | Issue Raised | Resolution | Section Affected |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Pre-Submission Checklist
- All three reviewers have provided feedback
- Each reviewer’s strongest objection has been addressed in the manuscript
- Technical errors have been corrected
- Textual fidelity to Lacan has been verified
- Ontological claims have been philosophically vetted
- Manuscript revised based on all review feedback
- Final proofread completed
- Submission materials prepared for target venue